January 2nd, 2007


(no subject)

yay metastupid! fallingangels has a personal grudge up his butt, which he feels the need to retaliate to here but doesn't post the link for context "for the benefit of that community so it wouldn't get lots of members that have nothing to do with the community it is associated with". yes, right.

and then he starts freezing replies on the second page of comments because "Don't need this stupidity filling my email box. Not good enough to grace my email box."

we don't take kindly to those shenanigans here in stupid_free, so thanks to all comm members for giving him a proper reception.

edit: whoops, he's started un-freezing again. but yay for caps:

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

edit #2: and some more internal stupid, can someone please tell me what the hell ladyghost316 is going on about?

"If you spent more time in school listening instead of bee-bopping, sliding and chillin' maybe you'd understand more about ethical and moral issues you'd be able to discuss these topics in an intellectual manner with people on the internet. Maybe your response then would be enlightening, and constructive.

Whoops, I'm going way over your head here, so let me just end this in terminology you understand.

Whatever bodecker

um, bodecker? wtf? because we all know that the lovely miss recorded_time is always so preoccupied with her "sliding and chillin.'"

and on another note, i do believe ladyghost316 was a source of stupid and had her own entry in here a few months ago...
  • decim


An unrelated rant is posted in customers_suck. Although she claims she meant to post it in workangst, she also managed to post it in co_workers_suck and bad_service. People call her on it, and this is her reply:

sweetassalt: i was trying to post it to workangst. i figured it belonged there, didn't it? it was just this one, and the co workers suck thing. i was really, really, really tired and just pissing around. i really don't want to delete all of this, because i don't want people to think that i'm taking it down because people are talking shit on me. i deserve it. i'm okay with that, cause i fucked up. i was just trying to explain. that's all.

Ah, I see. She also has yet to delete her two posts in co_workers_suck: both the original post, and her apology post that she doesn't know how to delete posts.

How does someone accidentally post something to three communities?

sweetassalt has already been introduced into stupid_free in this post.
megan lick

LOL Nazis


Gotta defend the pretty!

Over on mock_the_stupid, herbthegirl posts about the stupid excuses some girls use to defend a classmate charged with raping three girls (i.e., they think he's too hot to rape anyone and people accusing him must just be jealous of his baby mama).

She also posted about how her friend defended him because she's a Christian who doesn't believe in judging people, and in the next breath says herbthegirl only thinks he did it because she never liked him.

She points out that she's mocking the reasons they're using to defend this guy, not the defense itself. And they are pretty stupid reasons, right?

Not according to the members of MTS. They jump right on the bandwagon with stupid reasons of their own, defending strangers over the Internet. We have:

"Not only is she a Christian, but she is an American. And a damned fine one at that." Why? Because she judged her friend instead of the accused rapist.

"Just because the initial discussion about how he wouldn't 'need' to rape anyone is stupid doesn't make it less valid in pointing out that these people are siding with him because of who he is and what he represents."

There's also a few people saying that maybe the girls got together and made it up because "that's how high school is."

And when several posters start talking about him being innocent until proven guilty, there's this gem:

"Even if he was convicted, would that really mean it was 'proven'? Just because there's a pretty little saying about something doesn't mean it's true ... If the girls could prove that sexual contact did occur with them, it would be their word against about whether there was consent or not, and he could perfectly easily be convicted even if each girl gave very clear consent. Hell, even if the girls raped him."

I just... don't even know where to start with this. I have no problem with people defending their friends, but a.) do it with a better argument than "he's pretty!" and b.) defending a complete stranger over the internet while simultaneously ignoring the actual mock completely? My judgment: Stupid.

(Oh no, I must be one of those judgmental, jealous, non-Christian, un-American people.)